The Contrarian View: All in the Family? Maybe…
Family management guru Jay
Hughes, in his classic and influential book, Family Wealth: Keeping It in the Family (Princeton, NJ: Bloomberg
Press, 2004), provides a road map for families who wish to work together as a
group to preserve their human, intellectual, and financial assets. When done well, managing wealth cohesively as
a family can have enormous advantages, both financially and emotionally. However, family leaders and their advisory
teams too often presume that newly liquid wealth ought to be managed and controlled as one unit. Despite the
advantages of doing so, make no mistake about the hardships such a journey will
almost certainly bring.
Don't get me wrong being a
unified "financial family" is not an all-or-nothing proposition. Invariably, most families have one or more
assets that must be managed as a single unit.
The key question is how best to create a balance between singular,
unified management of wealth and the human autonomy often desired by individual
family members. More than one family
situation has gone awry because this balance of unity and autonomy was never
discussed, debated, and decided.
If a family is already
emotionally strained or lacks capacity to create compromise without regret, its
members may not be ready to sit down to a dinner of financial stew. Serious heartburn can result. Further, dad and/or mom, in the name of
protecting the hard-earned financial wealth from taxing authorities and
creditors, may become willing pawns in the creation of byzantine legal
structures. Worse yet, they may attempt
to use money as a tool to control offspring and their behavior. These situations tend to increase the
toxicity of the family environment.
Assuming up-front motivations are
pure, families should enter into a long-term financial arrangement with the
same level of diligence one might use when undertaking any investment with
third parties. It is typically best to first examine the plan's intent and
structure as if doing so through the eyes of an unrelated third-party private
Why would we want to do this together as a
group, versus either going it alone or with some other group?
What do we seek to gain by working together,
both for ourselves and for those who will or might come after?
How will we make decisions?
What are our respective roles and
How will we communicate and act with each other? How often and to what extent will information
be shared? What about communication
outside the family, understanding that those on the outside world have certain
assumptions of their own – and not always well intentioned?
How often should our up-front assumptions and
agreements be revisited?
If I or others are no longer willing or able to
be a part of the family financial cabal, what is the process for unwinding our
affairs in an orderly and civil way?
Once the preceding questions are discussed and alignment is
achieved, families should test their plan against the grizzled veterans who
have paved the path before them. In my experience, wealth-owning families are
surprisingly candid and constructive in one-on-one peer discussion about their
experiences. Family leaders are generally wise to choose not only advisors who
know families with experiences to share, but also those who are willing and
able to connect peer families with one another.
As family-to-family facilitators, advisors must have the knowledge,
courage, and network of resources to help these peer connections succeed.
I believe the aphorism "shirtsleeves to shirtsleeves in
three generations" has become a universal and truthful proverb. Driven in
part by human behavior, the inertia of generational family wealth often follows
a pattern: the first generation creates the wealth, the second preserves it,
and the third spends it. Mr. Hughes
posits that families can break this generational cycle and preserve or build
wealth for generations if they employ strategies already proven by a handful of
legendary financial families. I have no
quarrel with this wisdom. However, I do
caution that those eager to accept this approach should consider thoughtfully
whether and how much of this family journey should be done as a group. If family relationships are not on solid
emotional footing, real groundwork may be necessary before joint pursuit of
wealth preservation will solidify the family's footing and ultimately help achieve
2017 Threshold Group is a Registered Investment Adviser.
Information and recommendations contained in Threshold
Group's blog posts, market commentaries and other writings are of a general
nature and are provided solely for the use of Threshold Group, its clients and
prospective clients. This content is not to be reproduced, copied or made
available to others without the expressed written consent of Threshold Group.
These materials reflect the opinion of Threshold Group on the date of
production and are subject to change at any time without notice. Due to various
factors, including changing market conditions or tax laws, the content may no
longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Where data is presented
that is prepared by third parties, such information will be cited, and these
sources have been deemed to be reliable. However, Threshold Group does not
warrant the accuracy of this information. The information provided herein is
for information purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment,
tax or legal advice. Investment advice can be provided only after the delivery
of Threshold Group's Brochure and Brochure Supplement (Form ADV Part 2A &
B) and once a properly executed investment advisory agreement has been entered
into by the client and Threshold Group. All investments are subject to risks.
Investments in bonds and bond funds are subject to interest rate, credit and
inflation risk. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.